Showing posts with label chicago. Show all posts
Showing posts with label chicago. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 03, 2010

Back?

Well, it's been almost a year since I put anything on this blog. Strange enough to say but not much has really happened in that whole time except for the last 6 months. So here's a quick update.

September 09
  • I finally quit working the door at Estelle's in progress of moving to Las Vegas.
  • I had a going away party at Estelle's that was very successful. If you were there I thank you and I swear, I am leaving some time. (Technically I did leave. I just haven't made it to where I want to be yet, physically or mentally.)
  • I packed up all my stuff and moved to the U of Woo to prep for the move to Vegas.
October 09
  • I decided to finally get my teeth fixed. I started the process to get them removed.
  • I spend time in and around Dixon with old friends.
November 09
  • More appointments are made for more dental work. 2nd round of tooth removal.
  • I spend the first birthday in 8 years sober and not playing grabass with random people and friends. It wasn't as fun as everyone always told me it used to be.
December 09
  • After spending 3 months at my Mom's house and having recurring monthly bills, I find that funds are running low. I go back to work at Estelle's. First two weeks are without any teeth in my head.
  • I begin the process of finding couches to crash on while in Chicago. Based on the thought that if I get an apartment I'll end up back in the same routine.
  • Christmas time and I get my new teeth! Best present I've given myself in decades.
  • New Year's Eve off. First time in a decade. Ended up at Double Door and had a great time. Local H and Electric Six played.
January 09
  • I continue the process of crashing on couches so as to not just stay working the door. I do this because I know I'm a creature of habit and ease.
February 09
  • I decide that I will be leaving for Vegas during the 3rd week of March. This way I can swing through Austin and see family as I go. Plus I might catch some of SXSW.
  • Departure date postponed so Estelle's can have more time to find replacements. Now I'm planning on April 1st to be my last day working the door at Estelle's.
So that's basically all that's been going on with me in a nutshell. I'm sure I've left out a lot of things but these are the important ones.

In other news, I'm slowly putting the word out that I'm looking for a bar management or security management job. I think that might be enough to keep me around Chicago. Keep you around Chicago? Yep. I have no plans set in stone. I'm open to possibilities as long as the possibilities are worthwhile.

I'm glad that I didn't find a sublease or an apartment when I came back. Even though it would make things a lot easier, if I had I'd be stuck. I'm already burnt out on the door again. I'm in need of more stimulation in some form.

Tuesday, December 02, 2008

City Budget Highlights.

I found this on the Chicago Sun Times web site. I found it interesting. My thoughts are italicized.

Highlights from Chicago's 2009 city budget

November 20, 2008
  • 635 city employees laid off — possibly dozens less, depending on how many take cash incentives to retire.
  • More than 1,600 vacant jobs eliminated.
  • Six partial shutdown days around the holidays.
  • Slow police hiring to 200 in 2009, saving $10 million.
    • Because we definitely don't need more cops. We like being the Murder Capitol of the nation.
  • Raise amusement tax to 5 percent on live theatrical, musical and cultural performances in venues seating more than 750 seats and 9 percent for sporting events, concerts and movies.
  • Extend amusement tax to include 135,000 Chicagoans who get their cable TV by installing a satellite dish.
    • Obviously Chicago owns the air and space that is directly above us. This is ridiculous.
  • Increase parking tax — from $2.25 per car to $3 — on motorists who pay more than $12 to park.
  • Lower Denver boot threshold from three unpaid tickets to two older than one year.
  • Six-week amnesty for 3.5 million overdue parking and red-light tickets Dec. 1 to Feb.14.
    • Basically only good for any tickets before Jan 1st, 2007. If you got it in 2008 you don't get any type of help.
  • Blues and Jazz fests reduced from four days to three with fewer stages at each.
    • Must not be making much money off the show.
  • Double daily library fines from 10 to 20 cents.
  • Raise ambulance fees from $325 and $8 a mile to $600 and $13 a mile for basic life support and from $400 and $8 a mile to $700 and $13 a mile for advanced life support. Nonresidents will pay $100 on top of that.
    • Nonresidents should know better than to get injured or sick while visiting this city. Because your less of a person than those that live here.
  • Raise residential permit parking guest passes from $10 to $16 for a book of 30.
    • This makes sense to me.. strange.
  • Increase the public vehicle license fee paid by limosuines and charter buses from $100 to $200 to $500 for everybody.
  • Raise $9 million by requiring businesses and residential high-rises to purchase annual licenses for their garbage containers at a cost of $80 to $780.
  • Cut $1.7 million city subsidy for free trolley rides.
    • There's free trolley rides here? Wow.. I don't get out much.
  • Privatize 35,000 parking meters by year’s end and apply $150 million to shortfalls this year and next. If it doesn’t work, more layoffs and tax hikes needed.
    • Yes!! Privatize them so the company that gets the contract can make even more money than the city did! Brilliant!!
  • Establish five-year, $100 million annuity with discretionary proceeds from the Midway Airport lease and spend $20 million a year through 2012.
  • Save $5 million by consolidating city departments that handle consumer issues, human services, economic development and business affairs.
  • Install red-light cameras at 50 more intersections.
    • 50? Why not every 6 corner intersection and every intersection crossing a highway. Might as well make the most out of them. Will they catch bicyclists that don't stop as well?
  • Raise $2 million by seeking sponsorships for city assets and events, beginning with a new agreement to provide beverage and vending services and city-owned facilities.
  • Eliminate Fire Department Segway patrols in the Loop.
    • There was a need for this to begin with?
  • Raise daily and annual fees for merchants at Maxwell Street market to save popular Jumping Jack program for neighborhood festivals.
    • Uh.. the Jumping Jack program is idiotic. What service does it really serve that the neighborhood organizers couldn't find in some other form?

Chicago's Parking Ticket Amnesty Program

Chicago has decided to start up the Parking Ticket Amnesty Program again. It's been about 6 years since the last opportunity for people to get a little help with their parking tickets.

Six years ago the city offered to wave all late fees on tickets and cut the prices on the tickets in half. This time around they're just going to cut the late fees in half. Oh, and only to the tickets you got before Jan 1, 2007. As if that's really going to help out a lot of people.

It is a good smoke screen to get people to actually fess up to the tickets they have. It will also make it easier for the city to get up to date addresses on people that have moved a hundred times since their last ticket. That way the city can actually send you notices and they can add more late charges.

However, if you do have parking tickets from before January 1st, 2007 then I guess this is good. Considering that most late fees on tickets after a year are at least a hundred bucks, so now you're just spending an extra fifty bucks.

I know what the ticket game is like. After all, I'm on a payment plan for $1,500 worth of them. Of course, all of mine were after January 1st, 2007. Once again, no help for me.

So is it really all that good of a deal? I guess so if you have a ton of tickets but it doesn't seem like much.

The amnesty program was inspired by the newly signed bill that has dropped the number of tickets that will get you the boot. Which was recently dropped from 3 tickets to 2 tickets. That's right, if you have two tickets on your name then your vehicles are now eligible for the boot.

If your not familiar with the boot system it works like this.

You have 2 tickets. They put the Denver Boot on one of your tires. Your car is now immobilized. You have 24 hours to pay off your tickets or start a payment plan to remove the boot. Plus a booting fee and a boot removal fee. If you can't make arrangements to remove the boot your car will be towed. Now you have towing fees and possible storage fees to pay for as well. If you don't make arrangements to pay off your tickets and the fees after a certain period of time; your car will be auctioned off to the highest bidder.

Here's the catch. Let's say you owe $600 total to get your car back. Your car gets auctioned off for $1,200. The city gets every penny of that and you still owe for your parking tickets, towing fees and storage fees.

So here's my suggestion.

If you have a car that is booted, you know you can't afford to pay off your tickets and the city is going to take it. Take everything you want out of the car and then take a baseball bat to it. Smash everything you can get to and then take a boxcutter and cut the upholstery to ribbons. Smash the windows, the radio and then pop the hood and start cutting belts and hoses.

I mean.. if they're going to take your property, sell it and then not even take the amount off of what you owe then why give them anything?

Tuesday, August 05, 2008

Stormy Weather.

Last night's storm was pretty wicked. Not that I needed a storm to keep me at home but it definitely did the job. At one point I was about to head down to the Double Door to see the Melvins and Big Business but the storm started up again so I stayed at home. At least I had a little company, a couple friends stayed most of the night at the house as well.

The storm also kept my Mother here over night as well. She just flew back from Austin TX yesterday. We had gotten dinner when she got back and just as we walked into the apartment the power went out. So she decided to stay over night since there were 85mph winds out near Dekalb. Just wouldn't be safe for her to drive the big conversion van 2 hours to home through the storm.

The neighborhood doesn't look too bad. Lots of branches both big and small were knocked down last night. I saw quite a few side mirrors knocked off of cars and a couple big trees fell across the roads. Didn't really notice any trees on top of cars in the close vicinity.

Power went out last night somewhere around 7:30pm - 8pm and it was restored about 3am. Figures that my bedroom light was on and woke me up when the power came back on.

I love big storms like that. The unpredictable factor was pretty high. Never know what could happen with such strong winds.

Heard rumors of a tornado touching down in Logan Square but haven't seen anything about it yet. Tornadoes were reported in the northern and western suburbs though.

Need to update my board game collection for next time.

Wednesday, July 30, 2008

Reply to Comment on New Chicago Pet Ordinance II

Comment by Melissa:

Honestly I think that the reasoning stating that it will reduce dog attacks is ridiculous.

Thank you. I haven't seen anything lately about dog attacks.

That being said, I think this law is a good idea. The shelters are not thinking of the bottom line, they are thinking of all the animals that have to come to them because they are strays or unwanted.

Not only strays or unwanted but due to the flooding in Iowa and Illinois. I've gotten the bulletins through certain organizations stating that they can't afford and don't have the facilities to keep taking on these animals left behind.

Once the term afford is used then the bottom line is being looked at. The bottom line is constantly looked at when ever a business is involved.

If you are not a breeder or showing them then what is the big deal to get them fixed.

Personally, I'm not fixed. Perhaps I should be but that's still in question. I was created this way and I like how I am. Can you ask your pet if it wants to be fixed? When a dog gets fixed it does change the animal. It becomes more sedentary, gains weight and is less attentive. In some cases, like my Father's dog, it becomes more mean. It effects every being differently and there's no way to guarantee what will come of it.

As for cats. Definitely have them spayed or neutered. There's way too many of them getting into my garbage cans. It will also help to stop the cats from marking their territories.

If you can't afford it there are always places that have low cost deals.

I went to a mechanic once that offered low rates. I bought a new car shortly after.

The amount of unwanted animals is staggering and allowing your pet to get knocked up because you didn't want to bother is pathetic.

People not taking responsibility for their animals and allowing them to get "knocked up" without being fixed is pathetic as well. The people that don't want to bother don't need an animal. By that I mean, if a person has an animal and can't stop it from reproducing without altering it, they should not have an animal. Having an animal is much more than just feeding and watering it.

As for the strays, there are a lot of programs set up to spay and neuter them to help the population control as well.

And then what? Spay and neuter them and put them in cages. Hope someone takes them home? Or release them back into the alleys? Here's an idea. Catch the strays, let them sit long enough that someone might claim them. If not, euthanize them. If someone does claim them, then spay or neuter them.

Sounds horrible but there is a huge overpopulation of strays especially cats.

Head down to the shelter some time and look at all of the little lives that are on the line because their owners didn't want to bother fixing them.

I've been to a few of the shelters here and outside the city. I've seen the many puppies and dogs that are in there. I've seen the sad faces. I've also noticed that a lot of those animals are fixed. Whether they are fixed after arrival or before was unknown to me at the time. And it didn't matter, if I had found the right animal I would have adopted it anyway.

However, I've seen many many animals with sad faces. I've nursed kittens to health with eye droppers. I've raised chickens from the egg. I've had many animals throughout my life. I've had many that died in my hands. So even though it did effect me I'm not going to run out and change the entire population because certain idiots don't know how to take care of their animals.

I also will not try to lead anyone to believe that the shelters are full due to the simple reason that someone didn't get their animal fixed.

I will lead people to believe that the shelters are full due to:
  • Strays
  • Animals being taken out of dangerous environments
  • The flooding that occurred in Iowa and Illinois.
  • Puppy mills. Like the ones that sell the animals to pet stores.
  • People buying pets due to their popularity and not realizing the responsibilities involved.
I'm not a bleeding heart. I don't believe that society should condone what actions are good for everyone. If society and government has to condone everything then we all lose our own voice.

Reply to Comment on New Chicago Pet Ordinance

Comment posted by Miss Robyn:

Honestly, doll, I think this is a great idea. Nothing makes me feel more stabby than people who don't spay and neuter their pets- it's tantamount to animal cruelty.

Robyn, I'm very confused on how you think not getting your dog spayed or neutered is the same thing as animal cruelty? Is this supposed to mean that I constantly beat my dog every chance I get? Or that I don't feed or give water to my animal? Or perhaps since I don't think it's necessary to alter the animal; I tied a rope around it's neck and hang it from a window? Your comment is ridiculous. According to this I'm constantly treating my animal in an inhumane way because I'm allowing it to live the way it was created.

*So* many animals end up in shelters, or on the street because people didn't feel the need to get their pets spayed and neutered.


So people actually take their pets to the shelter just because they don't want to alter them? I would think that it would be more due to them not being able to take care of them or provide for them. Kind of like how people put children up for adoption.

It actually doesn't even cost that much- there are places that will do it for practically nothing.

Depending on where you live. I've looked into this and found that if you live in certain areas there is no help provided at all. Even still, for some people $50 is a lot. It's either groceries for a couple weeks or get your cat altered.

And hey, anything that prevents people from breeding dogs for fighting is great in my book. Do you know what happens to those poor dogs? It's disgusting. They hang a slab of meat from the wall by a rope, and then get the dogs to jump up and bite it, and then beat the crap out of them while they're hanging there- to dislocate the jaw and make them more vicious.

You don't actually think that this ordinance is going to stop or even help stop dog fighting do you?

The kind of people that are involved in dog fighting are off the radar. It's like the gang bangers that walk around with guns. They must not know that Chicago has a gun ban. Someone should tell them so they get rid of their guns.

How certain individuals treat animals should not be a good reason on how to treat the entire population of Chicago. Yes Robyn, I do know how fighting dogs are treated. I've seen plenty of documentation and clips. They're treated that way so they become fighters. Does that mean that my little 4 pound Chihuahua, that I will not breed, should be spayed?

Why won't I breed my dog? First off, she's too small to safely have puppies. Secondly, I'm a responsible "parent". I'm not going to allow more puppies to come about.

Why won't I spay her? I don't believe in altering an animal from how it's created for the simple ability to not worry about it becoming pregnant. I believe I'm a good enough parent to not let that happen. I've already talked with my veterinarian about having her spayed. It was suggested that it only be done if absolutely needed due to her size.

And then even when they're rescued they can't be adopted out because they're too dangerous. It's so so wrong.

I'll completely agree. Fighting dogs is wrong. It's horrible but it does happen. Any person that actually takes a fighting dog home with them should know the risks. A dangerous animal should be put down, no matter what.

Oh, and it said in the article that if your pet can't have it done for health reasons it would be exempt from the law- not that you'd have to kill it.


I might have read that wrong. The way I read it; you would have to get a breeder's license in order to keep it from being altered. Which, if you can't afford it, would lead to the altering process and possible death. Sure, I read it and write it here as a scare tactic but how else will people take notice.

New Chicago Ordinance - Forcefully Making You Spay and Neuter Your Pets.

Despite being the highest sales taxed city in the nation.

The extremely high acts of gun violence bringing Chicago back to the prestigious title of Murder Capitol of the USA 2008.

The City trying to levy a $2,000 Promoter's License on event organizers.

The City that thinks only 4am bars cause problems and forces only those bars to install cameras and have special training for the door staff of these bars. Thus bringing us the Late Hour Liquor License Safety Ordinance.

The tearing down of Grant Park for a Children's Museum.

Now thanks to Bob Barker (the really old Price is Right Host) and the City of Chicago......

Let us present the newest idiocracy to come forth.

I don't know the official name for this new ordinance but let's call it the Cutting All the Nuts Around Barksville to Indulge Stupidity or C.A.N.A.B.I.S. for short. Because someone's obviously smoking a lot of herb.

The italicized text was taken from the Chicago Tribune article. The bold are my thoughts.

The ordinance is sponsored by Ald. Ed Burke (14th), chairman of the Finance Committee, and Ald. Ginger Rugai (19th). They cited dog attacks on Chicago residents and said sterilized animals are less likely to be vicious.

Has this been proven or is this just a speculation? Less likely doesn't sound like something that has a 100% guarantee.

It "strives to control pet overpopulation in the city, seeks to eliminate unnecessary tragic dog attacks [and] can be used as a law-enforcement tool against those who use pets as weapons on our city streets," Burke said.

I'm still waiting to see some reports on how many vicious dog attacks have happened within the year.

A violation would result in a ticket telling the owner to have the pet fixed. If that failed, a $100 fine would be issued after 60 days. If another 60 days passed, a second fine could reach $500, and the city could impound and sterilize the animal. Owners would be able to reclaim their pets after paying the fines and other related costs.

Pets with medical conditions that make sterilization unsafe, show dogs, guard dogs and service dogs would be exempt. Animals belonging to federally licensed breeders also would be exempt, and pet owners could seek an exemption by applying for a city breeder's license, which would require a criminal background check.

So what if your animal can't be spayed or neutered due to health reasons and you can't afford a city breeder's license? Or don't need a City Breeder's License because your not going to be breeding your animal? Looks like the animal will have to die.

The effort was backed by PAWS Chicago, a no-kill humane organization focused on reducing the number of stray animals, and the Humane Society of the United States.

But it was opposed by the Chicago and Illinois State Veterinary Medical Associations, which said decisions on pet sterilization are best made by a veterinarian and pet owner. The groups also said such laws can reduce rabies vaccination compliance.

Who should know better? An organization like PAWS that's worried more about the bottom line or Veterinarians that treat these animals?

"I believe the reason we have this problem is because we have irresponsible pet owners," Ald. Ray Suarez (31st) said, suggesting the ordinance could be viewed as government intrusion. "There are irresponsible parents that are having sons and daughters out there. What's the next step?"

So here's the deal.

Your walking your dog or cat. Yea, I've seen people walk their cat. Someone decides to call 311 and report that your animal isn't neutered or spayed. The cops show up, they feel around and ask to see your records to see if your animal is spayed or neutered. For sake of argument it's not.

Well then, now you get fined $100 and 6 months to get the animal spayed or neutered. Six months goes by and you haven't done this. Because yes, it does change your animals attitude or what ever reason you have. Now more than likely they're going to want you to bring the animal in to prove that you had the process done.

When you show up and your animal hasn't had the operation you get fined up to $500 and the animal gets taken away from you. They do the procedure without your permission and they alter your animal for the rest of it's life.

Then guess what? You don't get your animal back until you pay the fines and the costs of said procedure.

What is wrong with this? The City takes your property from you. They alter it. And then they keep it until you can pay for the fines and costs. Let's consider what the costs could entail. Costs could include the price of the operation, the fees associated with keeping your animal in the pound, food, and handling of your animal during all of this. Hey, someone's got to pay these people for taking away your animal and taking care of it. Don't expect the City to pay for something they're doing to you.

Granted, this could be all looked at the same way people look at The Boot. You know, that thing you get when you get 3 parking tickets. Well, if they boot you then they get to take your car. Then they get to sell your car if you can't pay the fines and fees. Then they keep all the money and add the fees to your fines. They don't even apply the money they get from the auction to your fines. They keep it.

So how bout just forgetting your animal when they decide to take it.

Sound cold hearted and bad? Well imagine how many people just happen to have the money laying around to pay for this procedure. How many of those people have the money laying around to pay the fines?

Sounds like there's going to be a lot of dead animals soon. Because obviously most people won't take the time to contact their Aldermen. They won't take the time to tell their legislative voices that they think this ordinance is ridiculous.

Here's an idea. Go to this website and tell your Aldermen to shoot down this ordinance. Remind them that Bob Barker is 85 years old and should get his head check. Can he even still drive or ride a bike?

Let them know that this isn't about the money. This has a lot to do with the personality of your best friend and they're well being. Most veterinarians will agree that an animal should not be nuetered or spayed before the ages of 6 to 8 years. This is after the animal has fully developed. Even then it's not necessary to spay or neuter the animal.

Contact your Aldermen and let them know what you think.

If you don't then you have nothing to complain about. Your animals will be altered. If any of you decide to relieve yourself of your animals after the operations then you should receive one swift blow to the back of your head with a shovel.

And to anyone that says this must be done in order to stop violent dog attacks.

You are a fucking idiot.

Do you really think that the people with the violent dog fighting dogs will even know anything about this ordinance? Let alone abide by it? They don't even register the animals.

And overall, here's my ultimate question.

Bob Barker, do you even live in Chicago?

Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Brauerhouse tavern burns in Hillside

Original article found on Chicago Tribune Website:

THE BLOTTER
6:53 AM CDT, July 29, 2008




(Tribune photo by Michael Tercha / July 29, 2008)
Firefighters continue to work a four-alarm blaze at the Brauerhouse restaurant and bar in Hillside Tuesday morning. A fire broke out in the early morning hours.


A Hillside tavern just off the Eisenhower Expressway was consumed by flames early Tuesday morning, but no injuries were reported.

"It was closed, and the information we have is that no one was in the bar at the time," Hillside Police Sgt. Laith Ibrahim said.

The blaze broke out in the Brauerhouse, a bar and restaurant at 57 N. Hillside Ave. in the western suburb just before 2:30 a.m., authorities said.

Ibrahim said firefighters remained on the scene nearly four hours later, beating down the flames that heavily damaged the bar.

Brauerhouse, which opened in 1999, serves pizza and burgers and also is known as a live music venue. According to its Myspace page, punk, rock 'n' roll and rockabilly acts are featured.

Several neighboring suburban fire departments responded to the scene. Hillside fire officials, who are handling the investigation, could not immediately be reached for comment.

Ibrahim said that despite the bar's proximity to Interstate Highway 290, no major traffic problems had been reported.

Dan P.
Blake, Tribune reporter

Thursday, July 03, 2008

Racist Doorman.

You know what I really can't stand. People who change stories to try to make an impact.

If you've followed a link to this page then chances are you know me. You've probably seen me at work doing what I get paid to do. I check id's and I keep the peace. If there's problems I try my best to take care of them in a more diplomatic way rather than just throwing people out.

When I check id's at the door it's pretty simple. Show me your id and if your of age, and it's a legal document, you get to come in. Technically, we don't have to accept any type of id that's not issued by the United States or State government. Some people have even said that we aren't supposed to accept passports. Passports don't list any type of descriptions such as; height, weight, hair color, eye color. Passports are also issued for many years and the pictures are rarely up to date. I do accept them though.

I definitely don't accept any type of foreign id that I can't read. Is that my problem that I can't read Arabic, Chinese, German, or any other foreign language? No it's not.

So to Christine P, who has tried to slander me on Yelp, get your story straight. I didn't refuse your friend entry because he was, as you said, "Arabic". I refused him entry because he didn't have a passport and I couldn't read his id. Now remember, I wouldn't have had to let him in even with his passport but I would have had he had it with him. It would have been a 2nd form of identification and the two would have correlated.

The racist card is used way to frequently with doormen. Just because I'm a pale red head doesn't mean I hate someone that has color to their skin. That would be a ridiculous assumption. Such is the mentality that someone would publicly say that I'm a racist due to your friend not having the proper identification.

I wonder if I can sue her for public defamation? Any lawyers that read this please feel free to contact me. I'll give you a cut of the settlement. The review doesn't list me personally but I was working that night.

Tuesday, July 01, 2008

Gun Free?

Thank the gods Chicago is Gun Free, otherwise all these things would have happened for real.

All of these articles happened within the past 4 to 5 days in Chicago.

Boy shot released from hospital, girl still stable

Boy, 15, wounded in Chatham shooting

Boy shot in Austin neighborhood dies of wounds

Boy, 15, wounded in drive-by shooting on Chicago's South Side


Three adults shot to death in Chicago

Chicago arson investigator's shooting changes Fire Department policy

Alleged drug deal results in shooting death

1 killed, 7 wounded in overnight shootings across city

Man charged in fatal shooting at stoplight

You might be thinking, That's only 9 articles in 4 or 5 days.. Here's the kicker. It's 9 articles with 20 people shot or killed by illegal hand guns.

It's a damn good thing that hand guns are illegal. Just think, since they're illegal all the minors are carrying them around now. Why minors? Simple, if a minor gets picked up for a gun it's much more of a slap on the wrist than if one of the older gang members are carrying it. Let me rephrase that, it's more of a slap on the wrist than if an Adult is carrying it. I don't want anyone to think that all these shootings are gang related...

I mean, there are people stupid enough out there to shoot someone over their sneakers. Or because they flirted with their girlfriend. Yes, these people are f'ing idiots, but they're real.

With all these shootings how is it people actually feel safe? I'll admit that I carry a pocket knife. I was raised to always have one on me. I've never lived in an area where I'd carry it in my hand until I came to this city.

I don't make the assumption that I'm safe when I'm walking at night. I never rely on the police to arrive in a timely manner. If needed I'll do what I have to in order to be safe. Maybe one of these days I'll be a blurb on page 8.

Man shot after trying to protect himself from muggers.

So the only people on the street with hand guns are the Police and the "bad guys". Feel safe? Everyone knows what the turn around time for a 911 call is. It's not immediate unless it's really bad or the night is extremely quiet. Can you rely on the help?

I would gladly say that an open carry law in Chicago would be a good idea. I'd also say that there should be certain requirements needed in order to do so. Or maybe there should be more police on the streets. After the July 1st sales tax increase the city should be able to afford it. Oh wait.. maybe that increase was just to raise salaries.

Then again, in Chicago you need 60 college credits to become a cop. They don't need to be from any certain type of schooling though. It could be in basket weaving if you really wanted to become a cop. Weird huh? 60 college credits to become a cop and they still have the academy.

I would have done this already if I didn't think school was a waste of time and money.

Friday, June 27, 2008

2nd Amendment Upheld by Supreme Court - Could Chicago be next?

Just to start off, here's a few links to news stories that you might want to check out.

Daley vows to fight for Chicago's gun ban

Jury still out on city gun ban

Mayor Daley calls Supreme Court's gun-ban reversal 'a very frightening decision'


Landmark Ruling Enshrines Right to Own Guns



The 2nd Amendment was written for a reason. It wasn't put into the Constitution just for the government's uses but it was also put there for the common good of every person that lives within the border. I should reword this. For the common good of every person that 'legally' lives within the border.

Granted, it was written during a time when there wasn't a police force but that was then. Even now I believe that the 2nd Amendment should be fully instated everywhere. I grew up in a household that hunts and shoots firearms. For now, I do not possess any firearms within the city limits. It's illegal to do so thus I do not.

I believe that people should have the choice to bear arms. If you don't like guns then don't have them. Simple enough. I believe that a person should be able to have a handgun in their home for protection. A part of me thinks we should be able to carry them in public as well.

Mayor Daley stated, "Then why don't we do away with the court system and go back to the Old West..." at a recent speaking engagement at Navy Pier. Why not?

There were court systems in the larger areas during the "Old West". There was also local Sheriffs and Deputys in many of the towns and the gun was a major factor in many disputes away from the towns. Public hangings were allowed then as well. Imagine if they were today, would crime go down? No one knows until we try.

In today's society a trip back to the old west could be a disaster. With the generations becoming softer and more outspoken it could lead to a large 'thinning of the herd'. Which isn't necessarily bad in a theoretical sense but in reality it would be horrible.

Within the past few months here in Chicago there have been a lot of deaths due to gun violence. Which could possibly be used as a platform to help keep the gun ban. But here's the question that I pose.

Are these deaths due to "gun violence" a result of people that have the legal means to own the firearms?

The answer to this question is no. As of this time it is illegal to own handguns within the city limits of Chicago. So these people that are shooting other people are breaking the law to begin with.

So how can the blame be put on the guns?

I've wondered for years how anyone can say that guns are bad. I've never understood this. You can go out and adopt a child. Do you know what your going to get with that child? Do you know the family history behind that child? Do you know if that child will become an alcoholic, drug dependent or anything else about that child when you adopt it? No, you don't. It's a gamble but it's a gamble that is worthwhile.

Do you know what you get when you purchase a gun? You get a gun. You know that it was built. You know what it was built for and it never strays from what it is. Until the person that wields that gun decides to use it for something else. A gun is a gun. It's the decision of the person holding the gun as to what they use it for.

Another example.

As I'm writing this and you see any misspelled words. Who misspelled those words? Was it the program that I'm writing through or was it just me? Could I place blame on this program due to the fact that I pressed the letters in the wrong manner? No, I can not.

Guns bring more violence.

This argument is over done. The only way that the violence will raise is due to the fact that people will be able to defend themselves from the numerous thugs that already have the illegal guns. When people can stand up for themselves they will. When the playing ground is level there will be more instances. Perhaps now the right people will be getting hurt instead of the wrong ones.

Lately there has been a lot of deaths due to gun violence in Chicago. Mostly younger kids that have access to illegal firearms. Has anything been done to find out where these firearms are coming from? Why do these minors have them? Has anything been done to try and rid these areas of these firearms? No one knows for certain except those that are directly involved. There have been no statements made to confirm or deny these procedures.

However, I'm sure it will all come up in court once someone decides to try to overturn Chicago's ban. The city will gladly try to make it seem that all of these people that caused the shootings we're from nearby suburbs. Suburbs where it is legal to own handguns. They drove into the city to shoot a person.

Children's deaths due to guns.

Again, I don't believe that guns cause the deaths of the children that find their parents handguns. I believe that to be the full fault of the parents. If your stupid enough to leave a gun in your home, fully loaded and accessible to your child then your stupid enough to lose a child. That gun did not call out your child's name and it did not ask your child to pull the trigger.

Your an adult and a gun owner. Take the responsibility to teach your children about the gun and how it's to be or not to be used. Put the gun in a place where your child can not get to it. They make gun safes for a reason, not only to protect the guns but your family as well.


In a lot of the articles that I've read it seems that certain people are very scared that the citizens of Chicago could have guns. You can now legally own rifles and shotguns in the city. Rifles which can shoot farther and more accurately than a handgun. Shotguns that can be more destructive than many handguns. What's the difference? You can't hide rifles and shotguns as easily as handguns.

Imagine if the city decided to put forth a license for people to be able to carry a gun. It could be a reasonably priced license anywhere between $500 to $1,000. This license would only be available so people could carry the weapon in public. It would not be a license for ownership because that would be against the Constitution.

Now lets say a majority of people can now carry these weapons. When they are assaulted by a mugger, a rapist or any numerous other scenarios; they have the ability to protect themselves. They have the ability to level the playing field. I'm not advocating that this should happen, I'm just putting a scenario out there.

With the playing field leveled I believe there would be less crime. The "bad guys" would have more to worry about other than just the police or wearing multiple layers of clothing to escape. Of course in the beginning there would be more deaths on both sides of the spectrum. Which is why there would have to be certain training seminars that any person obtaining this license would have to go through to obtain it.

According to an article about Texas' Right to Carry law on the NRA-ILA website: "Gov. Bush vowed that Texas` Right to Carry law would make the state a "safer place," and statistics prove he was right. Texas` homicide rate has declined to its lowest point since the 1950s and has decreased a startling 60% from the high under his predecessor. Murder rates in Texas fell by 25% between 1995 and 1997, much faster than the 16% decline in states without "shall-issue" laws. Overall, Texas` total violent crime rate has dropped 20% under Gov. Bush and is lower than at any time since 1974."

Imagine if Illinois and Chicago adopted this policy.


Maybe people could walk around any where they wanted without holding their mace, a knife or any other object in their hands.

Friday, June 20, 2008

Blue Line O’Hare Out of Commission for July

Repairs knock out Blue Line O’Hare leg in July
By: Lorene Yue June 20, 2008

(Crain’s) — Riders taking the Blue Line to and from O’Hare International Airport will have to take part of the journey by bus in July due to rail work.

The Chicago Transit Authority is replacing deteriorated rails and ties on four miles of track between the Rosemont and O’Hare stations on the O’Hare branch of the Blue Line. Starting at 3 a.m. on July 8 until sometime July 28, trains will not run between those stations. Service will be covered via a shuttle bus.

That means for three weeks, Blue Line riders will have to jump on a CTA bus at O’Hare’s shuttle bus center instead of heading to the underground train station.

Track work is being done to improve travel on the Blue Line, where train speeds have been restricted due to the condition of the tracks.

Because of track conditions, trains between Rosemont and O’Hare are currently inching along in some areas at 15 miles per hour,” Ron Huberman, CTA’s president, said in a statement.

Once the work is complete, the Blue Line trains on the O’Hare branch should be able to reach speeds of 55 miles per hour.

Tuesday, June 17, 2008

Sallie Mae - Scourge of the Student Loan Seas

Student Loans and how they effect you can have a different outcome based on millions of different factors involved. The interest rates are usually very high and unless you have great credit or something worth more than the loans, you can't get another loan at a smaller rate to pay them off. The best way to skip the interest that they tack on is to just pay the loan off in a lump sum. For those of us that haven't won the lottery or inherited a Trust Fund it's not so easy.

I'll be the first to say this. I am a blue collar person, always have been and always will be. I'll also freely say that going to school was a huge waste of time and money for me. Why did I go to school then? Easy enough. I was refused a Warehouse Manager job because I didn't have a degree. I was told that I had the experience, the knowledge and the abilities but since I didn't have a degree the company didn't want me. So I asked my interviewer what kind of a degree a person needed to tell their employees how to organize and run a warehouse.

Their reply was, "Any kind." Turns out, some companies just want to know that you have a degree to show that you actually stuck something out for the long run. Seriously, some employers require a certain number of college credits. They can be anything and the classes that you take don't even have to reflect on the job your applying for.

That's when I decided to go for one of the easiest degrees I could think of. Multimedia and Web Design at the Illinois Institute of Art in Chicago. I basically decided on this since a close friend at the time had taken the same course. I had helped her with many of the assignments and it seemed easy enough.

I went to the school and had all my paperwork ready and talked with an admissions adviser. We went through the financial aide and it was told to me that I would be completely covered for the entire 3 year length of the course by financial aide. This was important at the time since I was already working a full time day job just to keep up with rent and bills.

Half way through the course my financial aide was declined. I was told that it had ran out. This didn't make any sense to me since it was already told to me that I would be fully covered for the entire course. At this time I was carrying a 3.2 grade point average and working 2 full time jobs.

So I decided to cancel the classes I had and just drop the course. I went to the counselors and talked to them about dropping the classes I had scheduled. They said to me that it was past the drop or add time period and even though I was dropping the classes and not attending them I would still have to pay for them. This made no sense to me at all.

So now fast forward to the Summer of 2007. I've now been working between different door jobs and I was very interested in becoming a Police Officer here in Chicago. One of the requirements is that you must have 60 college credits. Once again, the college credits could be from anything and not necessarily classes focused on Criminal Justice.

This I believe I do have based on the Illinois Institute of Art and a previous community college that I had went to. But alas, I can't get my transcripts since I owe ILIA money for classes I never went to and dropped before the classes actually started.

So. Now that the backdrop has been set.

It's now 2008. Most of my loans have been in forbearance. This means that you get a certain amount of time that you don't pay for the loan. The payments are added to the end of the loan but the interest still accrues as if the loan is just larger. Basically you get charged double interest on the payment. As with one loan I had that was for about $11,000 and has been in forbearance, it is now for about $14,000. These figures aren't exact.

All my loans are through Sallie Mae as I'm sure many students loans are. Sallie Mae has a huge amount of employees and a slow computer center. You can make a payment and still get calls from them for a week or more after the fact asking you to make a payment. It's only when you tell them to check the records that they will notice that you did make the payment a week prior.

A few months ago I had some loans that came out of forbearance. Sallie Mae, being the spokes company for efficiency, never reported that this happened. One would think that a company that is trying to get money back from you would let you know in some manner. Four months after the loans came out of forbearance I started receiving emails and phone calls. They want their money or the loans will default.

I, like some people, have a hard enough time creating credit. I don't need these school loans to default. Not only will it effect me but it will my co-signer as well. So I made a call to Sallie Mae.

Once on the phone with a pleasant southern accented associate I start asking questions. How much are my payments? When are the payments due? How much to break even with all the loans to this date?

The associate gives me a total amount to bring all of my loans current. I stress the word all because according to this associate an amount just short of $500 would bring all my loans current until the month of July. Then I would have a constant payment due for many more years to come. So in order to get everything current and save all the hassles I pay out the amount just short of $500 and get everything cleared away.

I'm now preparing to include these monthly payments into my budget. Thus, the addition of another job once again and the work schedule of 6 - 7 nights a week.

2 or 3 weeks pass. I start to receive phone calls from an unlisted number. I don't answer phone calls from unlisted numbers. Then I start to receive phone calls from a cellular number based out of Los Angeles. Then a cellular number from New York. I receive another call from the same cellular number from Los Angeles and decide to answer. Normally I don't answer numbers I don't know and return the calls if a voice mail is left.

I answer the phone and it's off to the races.

"Hello?"

"Hello sir, is this Derek D?"

"Sure is."

"Hi this is ____ from Sallie Mae services. Our records indicate that you owe $___. How would you like to take care of this today?"

"Excuse me?"

"Sir, this is Sallie Mae Student Loans. We're calling about the student loans..."

"Your calling me from a cellular phone number out of LA. Sallie Mae is located in Indiana."

"Sir, we have many different phone numbers. Now if I can just get your information."

"How bout you tell me my information. If your Sallie Mae then you already know it."

"Sir, we don't give out information over the phone."

"That's funny, I don't give my information to people calling me from a number registered to a cellular phone in LA when they're supposed to be at a company in Indiana." Then I hang up and call Sallie Mae.

I talk to a supervisor at Sallie Mae and report the problem. Turns out that it was them calling. They have different numbers that are not registered to them in order to try and collect debts. I ask why they're calling me since I just became current 2 - 3 weeks prior. To this the supervisor said I was not current and that he would transfer me back to an associate.

Turns out the associate that had helped me prior overlooked the different types of loans I had. There are two different types, private loans and federal loans. She had overlooked the federal loans. So I was close to defaulting on the federal loans. Even after asking her several times, "Now this brings me current on all of my loans correct?" she failed to realize that she had overlooked the federal loans. However, when I asked how much my monthly payments would be she didn't overlook them. She had the monthly payments correct.

After talking with the new associate I was able to put my federal loans into forbearance once again. After making the $500 payment only a few weeks ago I am maxed out on making any more huge pay outs.

I almost wish Sallie Mae was fully automated. Phone to computer, no errors unless there's a glitch in the system. Human error seems to be way too high when it comes to services like these. The people sit in a room with a headset on and read prompts off of a computer screen. No thought needed.

In fact, if you ever receive a phone call from this type of a business ask questions. Ask questions that will involve the person to back track and re-read. You can base the level of intelligence or boredom of the associate on their response time. It's kind of a fun game.

If you really want to have some fun then turn the tables. Ask the associate their Zodiac sign, their date of birth, their favorite ice cream and tell them that these will all be questions used to verify that they're actually living and breathing human bipeds and not quadrupeds from the 3rd moon orbiting Uranus. If they don't laugh and you keep with it claiming that they must be aliens, give yourself a pat on the back if they hang up on you.

Not to worry, they have a toll free number and if you call back odds are you won't get the same associate again.

Friday, June 13, 2008

(Addison, IL) Not So Cool Anymore.

Residents in Addison, Illinois face a sweltering problem. No more window unit air conditioners. Well... no more air conditioners in the front windows of any home. Ok, not in any window on any wall within 12 feet of any surface facing a street.

The Village officials in the western suburb have deemed window unit air conditioners to be unsightly. Claiming that they reduce property values and are eye sores to the public. Well... just the ones that you can see from the street. And the ones that have boards and styrofoam jammed into the sides to stop the cool air from escaping. Also the ones that have a bracing system built out of boards to help distribute the weight of the unit so as not to damage the windows they are in. They're just plain ugly.

Village officials deem this ordinance to be very important. With property values decreasing in the summer months and returning to the bland levels of value in the winter months. Jim "Bob" Horthtoe had this to say, "Well, it's got to be all these air conditioners in the windows that makes people not want to live here. It all correlates together. Air conditioners go in the windows and property values go out the door. It has to stop."

Addison residents are upset. Thomas McInglytosk says that his concerns rise from his family's well being. "What will happen when it's warmer inside our home than it is outside? Are we expected to move our television and game consoles outside for our children?" McInglytosk's concerns revolve around his children's sedentary lifestyle that will now face a dramatic change that will include sweating, weight loss, mass consumption of liquids and exercise. "My children (2 boys, ages 9 and 11, daughter age 8) will have to leave the house now to be comfortable. They might even go somewhere that has a pool."

John Berly, assistant village manager, had this to say, "I do daily battle with these landlords, most of them are absentee landlords who don't care that much. To us, [compliance with the ordinance] is a part of general maintenance and upkeep."

Standing in front of a local residence, clad in medieval armor and with his sword in hand ready to battle with a landlord, Berly continued, "The front yard is what the public sees. The condition of the front is a major factor in determining property values, and it reflects the community norms of acceptable maintenance."

I pondered what Mr. Berly said. I didn't dare say it aloud since his overall hit points more than tripled mine and I had forgotten my 20 sided die at home. Are the air conditioning units what actually determine the property value or the lack of central air? Could it be the overall appearance of the entire village or the employment rate? Crime rate or lack of quality housing?

The city will be able to find some of the perpetrators of this ordinance at least one day out of the year. When they do their annual building inspections. The only people that might get by with it would be the people that live in buildings that the village has deemed in good condition. These buildings do not receive the annual inspection. "The village inspects apartment buildings annually and charges an inspection fee of $50 per building plus $50 per apartment, though inspections are waived in some years for buildings considered to be in good condition," Berly said.

Berly, now in a heated battle with a Level 40 Landlord, noted that contractors have advised the council that costs could fall between $600 to $1,000 to retrofit buildings for air conditioners placed in walls. Cost will depend on the building structures and the amount of siestas needed on extra warm days.

Rising costs for heat, taxes, insurance, water, garbage removal and rent prices staying affordable,could make the costs too high to retrofit all the apartments. Consider a 14 unit apartment building could cost between $8,400 to $14,000.

With complaints coming in from all over the community Addison's mayor, Larry Hartwig had this to say, "We may have to look at fine-tuning it." The city has decided to only give out warnings this summer for any in window air conditioning units that don't comply with the ordinance. However, next summer the fine spree will begin at a cost of $500 per occurrence.

Ralph Johnson owns several apartment buildings. In order to abide by the city's new ordinance Ralph has had to have his residents sign an agreement not to use window air conditioners. "No one's happy about it but anyone higher than the 4th floor is visible from a street. I'm not paying the fines. If the city wants them to be miserable then let the city make them miserable. I have central air at home."

When asked if Ralph thinks his tenants will get upset and move to a neighboring town without such an ordinance he replied, "Yea, screw it. Let them move. Maybe then I can get Section 8 approved and get all that extra cash from the government."









Find the original article here: Chicago Tribune

Thursday, May 29, 2008

Henry H Perrit Jr.'s View on the Proposed Chicago Event Promoter License

An incredible supporter of the independent artist community Henry Perritt has asked everyone to help distribute his White Paper, "Why the Event Promoters Ordinance should be rejected".

Please read it, repost it and repost it again. ANY and ALL feedback welcome.

Why the Event Promoters Ordinance should be rejected
[27 May 2008]
  • The proposed ordinance does not address any public need


  • Often justified as a response to the 17 February 2003 stampede in the E2 nightclub, which killed 21 people, the proposed ordinance does not address the problems that led to that tragedy:


  • Too many people (1100) were in a venue that could safely accommodate only 300


  • The City of Chicago had not determined the safe capacity of the venue


  • The City had not acted on known building and fire code violations


  • The venue’s security staff did not respond appropriately


  • The proposed ordinance does not strengthen the City’s inspection and enforcement resources, powers, and will to act; instead it indemnifies the City from liability


  • The ordinances regulating places where food is offered for sale require periodic city inspections; neither the proposed ordinance nor the existing PPA requires inspections


  • The proposed ordinance targets event promoters rather than venue owners, although circumstances leading to the E2 tragedy were within control of the venue manager and not third-party promoters


  • Venue owners, not third-party promoters, are in a position to control everything that might jeopardize the health or safety of fans


  • The proposed ordinance does not fit the realities of how some of Chicago’s best music is made and promoted


  • The 2007 Chicago Music City report prepared by a group at the University of Chicago for the Chicago Music Commission concluded that music in Chicago generates a payroll in excess of $1 billion annually and fuels the overall economy in Chicagoland.
    • Significantly, it concluded that Chicago offers more kinds of music regularly than anywhere else except Los Angeles and New York, mostly in small clubs


  • Most of the small clubs are operated informally and present bands and other performers that operate on a financial shoestring, rarely earning more than a few hundred dollars for a performance, and rarely netting more than a few thousand dollars per year for their music


  • These bands and performers and the venues in which they perform scramble to attract an audience, relying on the band’s circle of friends and an occasional part-time amateur street team to distribute flyers and generate word of mouth


  • The proposed ordinance contains several provisions that would burden small venues and less-known bands disproportionately


  • It defines the regulated activity ( § 1-157-010, definition of “Event Promoter”) to include advertising so broadly that it would include:
    • Word of mouth generated by a band or its supporters
    • Distribution of flyers or posters publicizing a performance
    • Free notices of performances on websites such as MySpace music pages, while exempting paid newspaper advertising

  • It imposes unnecessary insurance requirements on promoters who have no control over safety in venues and thus are unlikely to be liable for injuries


  • It prohibits fans under the age of 21 from engaging in promotion activities, although younger fans other play a crucial role in encouraging turnout for performances


  • It would intimidate fans and band members from promoting a performance by requiring them to be fingerprinted and to fill out burdensome forms and keep burdensome records


  • Paradoxically, it would regulate promoters for events at small venues while leaving intact the existing exemption for the venues themselves (PPA § 4-156-305(c))


  • It exempts instrumental performances by groups with fewer than eight pieces (§ 4-156-305(f)) while providing no such exemption for small groups performing other kinds of music


  • It exempts large venues, where any risk to public health and safety is greatest


  • The proposed ordinance is unconstitutional
    • It violates the First Amendment by regulating speech in the form of advertising over-broadly

  • It violates due process by excluding ex-felons who have paid their debt to society and persons convicted of petty theft; federal court cases require a rational relationship between regulation of entertainment and risks to public health and safety; there is no such relationship here


  • It violates equal protection of minority groups by disproportionately burdening promoters from such groups


  • The City of Chicago should be supporting and promoting its smaller venues and lesser-known bands, but the ordinance imposes burdens instead


  • The City should publish and distribute to hotels and airports a directory of smaller venues and lesser-known bands


  • - It should provide links on its websites to private websites that offer current information about scheduled performances


  • - It should provide financial support to smaller venues and lesser-known bands



Henry H. Perritt, Jr.
Professor of Law
Chicago-Kent College of Law
Member of the Illinois Bar
hperritt@kentlaw.edu
(312) 906-5098

Tuesday, May 27, 2008

Looking for a roommate.

My roommate is moving out about the middle of July. So now I begin the process of finding a new one that won't suck. Oh joy...


1st ad posted on Craigslist. I think it's pretty much spot on...

-----------------------------------

$600 Roommate Needed - Mid-July / August 1st (Portage Park)

Early 30's male looking for one roommate. 3 bdrm with private balcony, free W/D on site, dishwasher, and garage. $600 a month plus half of utilities & cable/internet.
  • I rarely drink. Rarely doesn't mean Never.
  • I don't "party". (aka - Not Drug Friendly)
  • 7 out of 10 think I'm an asshole.
  • No late night parties.
  • No coke-heads, heroin addicts, or any other druggies.
  • You pay rent and bills first. Then go buy your big priced toys.
  • Clean up after yourself.
  • Occasional late night visitors. Let's not make it a habit.
  • Food and drink is there to consume. Replace it if you finish it.
  • No couples.
  • No cats. Small dogs OK.
About 6 - 8 blocks from the Montrose Blue Line stop.

If interested or want more info feel free to reply through the email below.

-----------------------------------

I'm sure I'll get a ton of responses.... possibly.

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

It's a Hipster Love Connection!

I admit, I go through the Missed Connections on Craigslist.com. There's some funny and yet very depressing stuff on there. Good material to go through for writing purposes.

Anyways, this one goes under funny for me.

-------------------------------------------------

tattooed guy in wicker - w4m - 20 (wicker park)

Date: 2008-05-14, 10:05PM CDT

I was walking with my guy roomate and you were with someguy also ..near damen and milwauk.. we were walking past eachother kind of fast. i was wearing black rayban sunglasses and a blue zip up hoodie with blue skinny jeans and red shoes a neck tattoo and my hair curly and half pulled back. lets party.

* Location: wicker park

-------------------------------------------------

Perfect descriptions for about 98% of the people that live or hang out in the Wicker Park area that is under the age of 27. Don't believe me? Go to Pontiac Cafe in the late afternoon or any 4am bar. Well, except Tavern, that place is filled with worse.

You have to love the ending. "lets party." Such a wide open sentiment. After reading things like this I often wonder what this person really means. Was it a catch phrase they picked up or do they actually mean the "hush hush" version of let's party? You know, the one where people snort a lot of blow and party for days on end.

Then again, maybe I shouldn't read things the way I see it.

Benefit for Delilah at Delilah's.

Head on over to Delilah's tonight to help out a good cause. If you've ever been there and met Delilah the rottweiler and her savior Cookie then you know all the details.

Delilah's is located at 2771 N Lincoln Ave in Chicago. They're open from 4pm till 2am tonight. That gives you more than enough time to stop by and enjoy the night. Cookie will be djing and giving away just about anything you could imagine. Almost anything...

Stop in, have a pint or two and help out the most lovable Rot you've ever met.

Monday, May 19, 2008

Chicago. #1 in all the wrong ways.

Chicago has highest gas prices in U.S.

By Associated Press
6:13 PM CDT, May 18, 2008

CAMARILLO, Calif. - A national survey says the average price for regular gasoline rose about 17 cents in the last two weeks, with the highest price in Chicago at $4.07 a gallon.

The average price of self-serve regular gasoline on Friday was $3.79 a gallon. Mid-grade was at $3.91, and premium was $4.02. That's according to the Lundberg Survey of 7,000 stations nationwide released Sunday.

For the first time, the survey found average prices for regular gas surged above $4 a gallon in two metropolitan areas: Chicago and on Long Island in New York.

Of the cities surveyed, the cheapest price was in Tucson, Ariz., where a gallon of regular cost $3.48 on average.


*EDIT* Last I saw, Regular grade self serve gas in Chicago was $4.25 and higher. I'm sure it's even higher the closer you get to downtown. -Rev